Return to Blog

April 18, 2022

Whitepaper: Best practices in bank-fintech partnerships

By

QED Investors and Boston Consulting Group are excited to share our co-authored whitepaper on the case for bank-fintech partnerships. Download the full paper below.

Banks have come to recognize that fintechs are neither a passing fad nor a mortal enemy. They must now determine what form their relationships will take: competitor, partner or a combination of both.

Those who successfully select and integrate fintech offerings to fill product gaps, improve customer engagement, drive operational efficiencies and generate incremental revenue will have a potent advantage over those who opt simply to coexist alongside fintechs.

Check out our new whitepaper looking at the case for successful bank-fintech partnerships co-authored with Boston Consulting Group (BCG).

- What are the best practices that banks need to keep top of mind when they're considering partnering with fintechs?

- Most fintechs started out as monolines, but many are now expanding their offerings to become full-service providers. What impact will this have?

- Categorizing fintechs in one of three buckets: direct competitors, adjacent competitors and enablers. There's not just a terrific opportunity for enablers, but also among adjacent competitors.

- The barriers to bank-fintech partnerships and the opportunities for success.

View and download the presentation here


QED Investors and Boston Consulting Group are excited to share our co-authored whitepaper on the case for bank-fintech partnerships. Download the full paper below.

Banks have come to recognize that fintechs are neither a passing fad nor a mortal enemy. They must now determine what form their relationships will take: competitor, partner or a combination of both.

Those who successfully select and integrate fintech offerings to fill product gaps, improve customer engagement, drive operational efficiencies and generate incremental revenue will have a potent advantage over those who opt simply to coexist alongside fintechs.

Check out our new whitepaper looking at the case for successful bank-fintech partnerships co-authored with Boston Consulting Group (BCG).

- What are the best practices that banks need to keep top of mind when they're considering partnering with fintechs?

- Most fintechs started out as monolines, but many are now expanding their offerings to become full-service providers. What impact will this have?

- Categorizing fintechs in one of three buckets: direct competitors, adjacent competitors and enablers. There's not just a terrific opportunity for enablers, but also among adjacent competitors.

- The barriers to bank-fintech partnerships and the opportunities for success.

View and download the presentation here


No items found.

Test column heading 1

Test column heading 2

Test column heading 3

Test column heading 4

This is a longer lorem ipsum text 1
This is a longer lorem ipsum text 2
This is a longer lorem ipsum text 3
This is a longer lorem ipsum text 4
This is a longer lorem ipsum text 5
This is a longer lorem ipsum text 6
TEst row
TEst row
TEst row
TEst row
TEst row
TEst row
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.

01

Settlement Collapse

Value transfer moves from days - corresponding banking, T+1 securities - to seconds. Working capital tied up in float is released.

02

Cost Collapse

Marginal transaction cost approaches zero: fractions of a cent, versus 1-6% on card and corresponding rails.

03

Programmability

Money becomes an object that carries logic - escrow, splits, rebates, compliance - executed by code, not back offices.

Pure infrastructure with no revenue accrual

Layer-1 chains and general-purpose middleware — outside our circle of competence and typically outside our stage.

Speculative asset creation

NFT platforms, memecoins, prediction markets styled as products — mapping to none of the five functions; structurally uninvestable for us.

Three structural truths cut across all five functions.

(a)

Regulated-first wins

The 2020/21 cycle proved permissionless purity does not survive contact with real financial regulation. GENIUS, MiCA, CLARITY and the UK/Singapore regimes are producing founders who start from “how do we get licensed” and build backwards — precisely the founder profile QED has always preferred.
(b)

Incumbents upgraded, not disintermediated

JPMorgan, Citi, Bank of America and Wells Fargo are jointly building a tokenized-deposit network; Visa launched a stablecoin platform in July 2026; 140+ businesses signed an open stablecoin standard. Banks migrate — and new-generation infrastructure companies own the picks and shovels of that migration.
(c)

Emerging markets feel it first

Every function improves most where the fiat experience is worst: cross-border payments, dollar access, investment product availability, working-capital finance. Those are exactly the geographies where QED has fintech ventures’ deepest footprint. Our geographic distribution is not incidental to the tokenization thesis — it is the thesis.

Trade & working-capital finance

Finkargo( LatAm import finance) and OatFi(B2B working-capital infrastructure) sit directly on flows whose logical settlement layer is stablecoin.

Collateralized digital-asset lending

Tokenized Treasuries, equities and stablecoin holdings as instant, programmable collateral.

On-chain private credt

Maple, Centrifuge and emerging institutional protocols - credit funds migrating to programmable rails.

Why QED is advanced

Credit is QED's craft: distinguishing lending businesses from fintechs pretending to be one, charge-offs earned from charge-offs deferred. On-chain credit is a straight-line extension, not a stretch.