Return to Blog

June 8, 2022

Practical advice for founders from the mindset of an operator

Over the last few days, startup founders have been offered a raft of austerity advice.

I have a somewhat controversial personal point of view. That is coloured by my stints as an operator/manager.

First things first, “be financially responsible” is evergreen advice. As a founder, you should always be disciplined in spending. It is even more applicable in rough times. Be frugal. I am not disputing this.

That said, now the more nuanced points.

1. Not all burn is created equal

If you have not yet found product-market fit and positive unit economics, then spending on sales and marketing is not wise. It is silly otherwise but can be lethal now in the days to come.

However, I would invest in core – such as, tech, product, credit/analytics for a lender. This is time to build. Competitors will regress. Consumers will be less distracted. You can go deep to understand your pull, build products to really solve the problem statement, and set up positive economics to scale.

Say “No” to frivolous spending. But “Yes” to genuine investments.

2. Worthwhileness vs survival

This is for early stage companies. If you are already at the growth stage, survival is the priority – there is no other question. Building a startup is inherently personal. Perhaps comparable to raising a child. By extension, it is hard to view it dispassionately.

However, if you are an early stage startup founder who has less than a 24-month runway, I urge you to take this point of view.

So, in two years, would you rather (a) know if your start-up was worthwhile Or (b) survive the winter to arrive with little capital and no insights? Starting up is not a job to cling to. It is an option to create something fantastical.

Go on that journey. Build your product, test it with customers, refine features, improve pricing, smoothen UX, build backend to scale, etc. By all means, be efficient in doing so. But, do all those things that will convince you that this idea is worthwhile. Because if you can prove that it is worthwhile, you will still be able to raise funding.

But, please don’t indiscriminately freeze expenses, shut experimentation, whittle down to a skeletal team and trickle through the winter. You may survive, but I am not sure what you emerge with will be worthwhile.

3. Silver lining

Dark times do bring some good tidings:

- Plentiful talent – through redundancy but much more due to low morale.  

- Easier customer attention – not an invitation to blow up marketing/sales, but to test and learn.

- M&A / acqui-hiring – to bolster product proposition.

- And for the well-funded, land grab opportunities like none other.

That’s my point of view borne out of earlier downturn experiences. I don’t profess these are absolutes – just that things are not black-and-white. And that you should focus on worthwhile goals. And that there is hope yet.

Over the last few days, startup founders have been offered a raft of austerity advice.

I have a somewhat controversial personal point of view. That is coloured by my stints as an operator/manager.

First things first, “be financially responsible” is evergreen advice. As a founder, you should always be disciplined in spending. It is even more applicable in rough times. Be frugal. I am not disputing this.

That said, now the more nuanced points.

1. Not all burn is created equal

If you have not yet found product-market fit and positive unit economics, then spending on sales and marketing is not wise. It is silly otherwise but can be lethal now in the days to come.

However, I would invest in core – such as, tech, product, credit/analytics for a lender. This is time to build. Competitors will regress. Consumers will be less distracted. You can go deep to understand your pull, build products to really solve the problem statement, and set up positive economics to scale.

Say “No” to frivolous spending. But “Yes” to genuine investments.

2. Worthwhileness vs survival

This is for early stage companies. If you are already at the growth stage, survival is the priority – there is no other question. Building a startup is inherently personal. Perhaps comparable to raising a child. By extension, it is hard to view it dispassionately.

However, if you are an early stage startup founder who has less than a 24-month runway, I urge you to take this point of view.

So, in two years, would you rather (a) know if your start-up was worthwhile Or (b) survive the winter to arrive with little capital and no insights? Starting up is not a job to cling to. It is an option to create something fantastical.

Go on that journey. Build your product, test it with customers, refine features, improve pricing, smoothen UX, build backend to scale, etc. By all means, be efficient in doing so. But, do all those things that will convince you that this idea is worthwhile. Because if you can prove that it is worthwhile, you will still be able to raise funding.

But, please don’t indiscriminately freeze expenses, shut experimentation, whittle down to a skeletal team and trickle through the winter. You may survive, but I am not sure what you emerge with will be worthwhile.

3. Silver lining

Dark times do bring some good tidings:

- Plentiful talent – through redundancy but much more due to low morale.  

- Easier customer attention – not an invitation to blow up marketing/sales, but to test and learn.

- M&A / acqui-hiring – to bolster product proposition.

- And for the well-funded, land grab opportunities like none other.

That’s my point of view borne out of earlier downturn experiences. I don’t profess these are absolutes – just that things are not black-and-white. And that you should focus on worthwhile goals. And that there is hope yet.

No items found.

Test column heading 1

Test column heading 2

Test column heading 3

Test column heading 4

This is a longer lorem ipsum text 1
This is a longer lorem ipsum text 2
This is a longer lorem ipsum text 3
This is a longer lorem ipsum text 4
This is a longer lorem ipsum text 5
This is a longer lorem ipsum text 6
TEst row
TEst row
TEst row
TEst row
TEst row
TEst row
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.

01

Settlement Collapse

Value transfer moves from days - corresponding banking, T+1 securities - to seconds. Working capital tied up in float is released.

02

Cost Collapse

Marginal transaction cost approaches zero: fractions of a cent, versus 1-6% on card and corresponding rails.

03

Programmability

Money becomes an object that carries logic - escrow, splits, rebates, compliance - executed by code, not back offices.

Pure infrastructure with no revenue accrual

Layer-1 chains and general-purpose middleware — outside our circle of competence and typically outside our stage.

Speculative asset creation

NFT platforms, memecoins, prediction markets styled as products — mapping to none of the five functions; structurally uninvestable for us.

Three structural truths cut across all five functions.

(a)

Regulated-first wins

The 2020/21 cycle proved permissionless purity does not survive contact with real financial regulation. GENIUS, MiCA, CLARITY and the UK/Singapore regimes are producing founders who start from “how do we get licensed” and build backwards — precisely the founder profile QED has always preferred.
(b)

Incumbents upgraded, not disintermediated

JPMorgan, Citi, Bank of America and Wells Fargo are jointly building a tokenized-deposit network; Visa launched a stablecoin platform in July 2026; 140+ businesses signed an open stablecoin standard. Banks migrate — and new-generation infrastructure companies own the picks and shovels of that migration.
(c)

Emerging markets feel it first

Every function improves most where the fiat experience is worst: cross-border payments, dollar access, investment product availability, working-capital finance. Those are exactly the geographies where QED has fintech ventures’ deepest footprint. Our geographic distribution is not incidental to the tokenization thesis — it is the thesis.

Trade & working-capital finance

Finkargo( LatAm import finance) and OatFi(B2B working-capital infrastructure) sit directly on flows whose logical settlement layer is stablecoin.

Collateralized digital-asset lending

Tokenized Treasuries, equities and stablecoin holdings as instant, programmable collateral.

On-chain private credt

Maple, Centrifuge and emerging institutional protocols - credit funds migrating to programmable rails.

Why QED is advanced

Credit is QED's craft: distinguishing lending businesses from fintechs pretending to be one, charge-offs earned from charge-offs deferred. On-chain credit is a straight-line extension, not a stretch.